Re: Two long-term problems
Jay Gischer (email@example.com)
Thu, 29 Sep 94 16:31:38 -0700
Rich Skrenta writes:
> > Why not make the bribing noble pay for the newly acquired noble with
> > his own NP?
> Now there's an idea. Require TERRORIZE/BRIBE/whatever to pay for
> the new noble with whatever number of NP's a FORM would cost.
> The noble comes over as contract or fear loyalty, and the new
> owner can build from there.
Thus making TERRORIZE/BRIBE/whatever pointless. If you allow some
players to take gold from other players by force or stealth, why not NP's?