>> I think doing away with safe havens is a truly terrible idea, just about
>I don't plan to get rid of safe havens (or some foolproof anti-attack
>mechanism). I have no intention of letting newbies get slaughtered on
>their first turn in the game.
>But what does intrigue me is seeding the cities of Olympia with
>default garrisons which would have to be removed by those wishing
>to claim those lands for themselves, or to pillage them. Carl's
>idea of allowing players to stack with the default garrison, and
>earn a small sum also appeals to me.
>Rich Skrenta <email@example.com>
-- Chip Charnley firstname.lastname@example.org email@example.com My opinions are my own and do not represent anyone but myself.