Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?
Mark W. Oosterveld (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Wed, 24 Aug 1994 21:31:28 +0000
> There are several possible approaches:
> 1. Put the poster's From: on their contributions.
> 2. Include the identity of the character who receives
> the gold credit.
> 3. Include the identity of the faction that posts.
> 1 & 2.
> And, of course, "leave it alone", which is what I'm inclined to do,
> unless the players think that allowing anonymous posts is harmful
> and should be disallowed.
> Rich Skrenta <email@example.com>
I would go with leave it alone. I think that dis-information, in the times
at least, is definatly part of the game. I never trust anything I read in the
times. Only private email do I take seriously. But I think dis-information
should be kept to the times, or private email, and out of other public forums,
or we end up with flame wars, like the one starting in rec.games.pbm.