Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?
Jay Gischer (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Tue, 23 Aug 94 22:12:11 -0700
> Oh, I dunno. _Some_ trash & slander is okay (grin). Although I agree with
> the assertion that attacking Greg L. personally was WAY out of line (repeat
> after me: It's only a game...it's only a game...it's only a game...)
> Maybe you should make it a point to ID player posts as specifically that, and
> give people the option of either identifying themselves (by faction or
> player) or making "ANON" posts.
> I think the latter will have MUCH less credibility...
> Tony Baldacci
To me any unsigned message in the Times lacks credibility. I'd hate
to see the anonymous stuff go away. But the only solution I can think
of is censorship by our friendly GM. Ugh.