m. 5: Second chord in lute is improbable, but I'm not sure what it
should be.
m. 11, melody: Ledger line is unclear on last note.
m. 32: Melody split to correspond with mid-measure double bar in lute
part.
m. 39: Backward repeat bar supplied.
m. 40 et seq. (Sciolta): Rebarred from C| to (mostly) 3/2.  Original C|
barring is indicated by short vertical strokes.
m. 40: Forward repeat bar supplied.
m. 43, melody: Repeat bars added to correspond with lute (and by
analogy with first section).
m. 44, lute: Rhythm symbol over second note corrected from half to
quarter to correspond with melody.
m. 45, lute: Last digit is illegible. 1 (Eb) is supplied by analogy
with m. 12, but 2 (E natural) is certainly possible.
m. 51, melody: Repeat bars added to correspond with lute.
m. 55, melody: Apparently superfluous C| meter signature omitted;
repeat bar added between this measure and next to correspond with lute.
m. 58, melody: First note changed to from quarter to half note to
correspond with lute.
m. 59, melody: a2 changed to c2 to correspond with lute.
m. 59: Backward repeat bar supplied; whole note changed to dotted whole
to fill out 3/2 measure.
                                                                                
The rhythmic structure of the first section of this tune seems a bit
irregular; certain bits seem to want rebarring, but I can't find a
consistent meter that would work, so I'm leaving it in C| as in the
original.
                                                                                
Also, musical reasons lead me to suspect that many of the double bars
are not repeats, but merely section breaks (as in many of these tunes).
 I'm writing them with dots for the sake of consistency, as that's how
they appear in the original.  However, certainty on this point will
have to await a reconstruction of the dance, and I'm not conversant
enough with Italian dance to figure it out.  (English country dance
would be a different story...)