"Simultaneous execution" vs. phases-and-points

David desJardins (desj@ccr-p.ida.org)
Fri, 23 Sep 94 19:40:56 EDT

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Patrick McLaughlin: "Re: Combat -- Something Different"
Previous message: Tim Whalen: "Re: "Simultaneous execution" vs. phases-and-points"
In reply to: Rich Skrenta: ""Simultaneous execution" vs. phases-and-points"
Next in thread: Ed Bailey: "Re: "Simultaneous execution" vs. phases-and-points"

> From: Rich Skrenta <skrenta@pbm.com>
> Date: Fri, 23 Sep 1994 15:30:23 -0400 (EDT)

> Do you consider "simultaneous execution" to be a significant,
> desirable and/or essential feature?

Yes.

> And if so, why?

Because it makes the game hard to play well.

David desJardins

Next message: Patrick McLaughlin: "Re: Combat -- Something Different"
Previous message: Tim Whalen: "Re: "Simultaneous execution" vs. phases-and-points"
In reply to: Rich Skrenta: ""Simultaneous execution" vs. phases-and-points"
Next in thread: Ed Bailey: "Re: "Simultaneous execution" vs. phases-and-points"

Main Index | Olympia | Arena | PBM FAQ | Links