Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?

C.M. Yearsley (cmy@cs.keele.ac.uk)
Thu, 25 Aug 1994 14:16:19 +0100 (BST)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Rich Skrenta: "Rich not here"
Previous message: Mark W. Oosterveld: "Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?"
In reply to: Mark W. Oosterveld: "Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?"
Next in thread: Steve Chapin: "Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?"

> How about, if you want the 25 Gold credit, you have to add the "credit <unit>"
> line, and thus the message gets signed. (ie: For the Paper to pay for the
> article, it has to know where it came from.) But, if there is no
> "credit <unit>" line, no one gets paid, and the message is unsigned.
>
> Mark
>

That sound a good idea!

Chris

--
Chris Yearsley
cmy@cs.keele.ac.uk

Next message: Rich Skrenta: "Rich not here"
Previous message: Mark W. Oosterveld: "Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?"
In reply to: Mark W. Oosterveld: "Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?"
Next in thread: Steve Chapin: "Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?"

Main Index | Olympia | Arena | PBM FAQ | Links