Re: Statistics

Kevin Davis Connery (keradwc@rahul.net)
Wed, 24 Aug 1994 22:17:57 -0700 (PDT)

Messages sorted by: [ date ][ thread ][ subject ][ author ]
Next message: Mark W. Oosterveld: "Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?"
Previous message: Mark W. Oosterveld: "Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?"
In reply to: Rich Skrenta: "Re: Statistics"
Next in thread: DAZCapn@aol.com: "Re: Statistics"

> The GM report I get has top 10 lists for the various categories,
> but I think publishing them would be way too harsh on those in the
> lists.

How about publishing the -statistics- without the faction ID? People could
use it much the same way as the rankings, to see where they 'rate' in
various fields. This permits that data to be distributed without turning
the leading factions into targets.

--kdc

Next message: Mark W. Oosterveld: "Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?"
Previous message: Mark W. Oosterveld: "Re: Should the _Times_ be anonymous?"
In reply to: Rich Skrenta: "Re: Statistics"
Next in thread: DAZCapn@aol.com: "Re: Statistics"

Main Index | Olympia | Arena | PBM FAQ | Links