Jane & Mark Waks
waks at comcast.net
Tue Aug 1 05:46:26 PDT 2006
Mats Winther wrote:
> Pennick says that this game ought to be researched more, and this is
> perhaps the problem. Perhaps there is no singular good source.
Hmm. My main concern is making sure that the game really is that old.
Enough people have a tendency to equate "old" with "centuries old" to
make me a little nervous, at least until I've seen a bit of textual or
archaeological evidence. (And such evidence also ought to give me a
better idea of which culture(s) are known to have played it, which is
useful from an SCA perspective.) After the Tablero debacle a few years
ago, I've gotten a tad more cautious.
Complete rules aren't quite so critical to me -- I don't tend to
completely trust reconstructions anyway, until I've seen the originals
and can judge them for myself. But I'd like to know where the game comes
More information about the hist-games