hist-games: Freq. Asked Questions -- Part II

Robert Beaulieu robert.beaulieu at sympatico.ca
Tue Oct 21 10:22:30 PDT 1997


David KUIJT wrote:
> 
> 
> I like your classification below (proximity/knockdown).
> 
> This discussion also points out a problem area -- I recall at least one
> example (Strutt?  I'll try to check) where two players were rolling bowls
> (balls) at a single pin.  Now with multiple pins we can be reasonably
> certain that the objective was to knock them over.  With multiple balls
> aiming at a single smaller ball it is fairly clear that the objective is
> proximity.  But when two players have one ball each and are rolling at a
> single pin it is harder to say -- the objective could equally well have
> been proximity, rather than knockdown.  Or it might even have been both: a
> reasonable game could be constructed where the winner is the one closest
> to the pin, and knocking down the pin constitutes an instant win.
> 


	Or an instant lost!!!


		Lord Robert de QuelQuePart

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send email to majordomo at pbm.com containing
the words "unsubscribe hist-games". To contact a human about problems, send
mail to owner-hist-games at pbm.com



More information about the hist-games mailing list