> 	We members of the SCA have been imposing on the good nature 
> of owner-hist-brewing with our continued comments on things that are 
> only of interest to SCAdians, such as documentation procedures, and 
> most recently the Society Exchequer's letter about brewing.

Indeed, the Exchequer's letter had little to do with this list. But,
as I said, I didn't mind the documentation procedures discussion, as
mundane historical brewers also have the equivalent in their
competitions.

> 	I have therefore established a new listserv called
> <SCA-Meridian-Brewers@onelist.com>, where we can freely discuss
> SCA-specific matters such as Period documentation and SCA brewing 
> politics, both in Meridies and Society-wide, as well as brewing, vintning, 
> and mead-making prior to AD1600.

I would recommend against this. Although I am an SCA member and I
could have intentionally founded a SCA brewing list, I didn't. Why? I
didn't want discussions about brewing, vintning, and mead-making prior
to 1600 to not include the non-SCA historical brewing community.
Therefore, I would suggest that you encourage the members of your list
to bring discussions relevant to this list to this list.

Otherwise, we've just split the brewing community down the middle, and
we all lose.

-- greg



-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send email to majordomo@pbm.com containing
the words "unsubscribe hist-brewing" (or unsubscribe hist-brewing-digest, if
you get the digest.) To contact a human about problems, send mail to
owner-hist-brewing@pbm.com