hist-brewing: Domesday ale report at three years
JeffRenner at mediaone.net
Sun Jan 27 15:08:47 PST 2002
"PalomaHill" <palomahill at yahoo.com> wrote:
>Jeff, thanks for the links to doomsday ale - I did a search on the Internet
>and found lots of notes from you in various archives specifying recipies.
>This connection is absolutely wonderful!
Glad you found useful information. Researching and making the
Domesday Ale was fun (including malting 14 lbs.of oats).
I thought I'd give a tasting report at three plus years.
First, to recap, on October 5, 1998 I made about 3 gallons of 1.096 ale with:
11 lbs. home malted oats
5.5 lbs Durst wheat malt
5.5 lbs Briess 6-row malt (very un-medieval but I wanted plenty of
enzymes to cover my lack of malting expertise)
7 ounces Baird chocolate malt (because I believe period malt was dark)
No hops or other herbs.
I fermented with lots of a repitched English ale yeast and got good
fermentation which finally stopped at 1.030.
It was very cloudy, actually murky (probably due to the home malted
oats) with a thick, oily mouthfeel. I let it sit until February in a
three gallon glass carboy. It settled out considerably but was still
cloudy and thick. I bottled it mostly in 7 oz. (175 ml) "nips" with
no priming sugar.
At this point it was thick, oily, sweet, alcoholic, and rather
simple. It had a bit of a pruney flavor, making me think of
alcoholic prune juice. I had hops that it would develop some bottle
I've opened bottles every few months over the last three years since
bottling. After perhaps a year it clarified (the sediment is now
solid and will hardly wash out).
Alas, I have been disappointed in the flavor - it is still simple and
one dimensional. It's sweet, very smooth (the oats help), noticeably
alcoholic (but not in the least bit harsh or hot), and still has that
mild prune flavor. I opened a bottle last evening and decided it
wasn't worth the calories or liver and brain cells, and poured it
down the drain. I will continue to open a bottle every six months or
so, I guess. Maybe something will happen, but it seems pretty stable
at this point.
I think if I were rebrewing this I would use some kind of gruit
mixture and perhaps some new yeast and sugar at bottling for
carbonation in hopes to of a more interesting ale. I guess the monks
at St. Paul's weren't as demanding, or maybe they were better brewers!
>I did find a commercial brew (thru Internet searches): (Devenish) Domesday
>ale by Cornish brewery co - from England. Perhaps it's not made anymore and
>it's not clear if it is a pure malt brew. I couldn't find much about it
>except that the name indictes it might be a pure malt brew.
That's interesting. Neither the brewery nor the ale are listed in my
5th edition (1997) of "The Real Ale Almanac" or several other
references I have dating 1987-1997. I doubt very much that it would
Regarding gruit, Adam Larsen's posts here should make good reading in
the archives. Are you still there, Adam?
Jeff Renner in Ann Arbor, Michigan USA, JeffRenner at mediaone.net
"One never knows, do one?" Fats Waller, American Musician, 1904-1943
More information about the hist-brewing