hist-brewing: Historical Wine Sweetening
Kirsty Pollock
kirsty.pollock at mpuk.com
Fri May 26 01:12:55 PDT 2000
If you don't add extra sugar/honey, then I would say you would get cider as
you wouldn't get the strength, but it's a grey area, I suppose. The length
of maturing differs. I'm not an expert, but if I was making apple wine I'd
be adding sugar.
KP
> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-hist-brewing at rt.com [mailto:owner-hist-brewing at rt.com]On
> Behalf Of NeophyteSG at aol.com
> Sent: 25 May 2000 20:49
> To: hist-brewing at pbm.com
> Subject: hist-brewing: Historical Wine Sweetening
>
>
>
> It's a common practice today to add sugar to "country wines,"
> but aside from
> meads and similarly honeyed brews, were historical/period
> "country" wines
> sweetened? Were they all-juice or did they add boiling water
> as is common
> now?
>
> On a different but related note: Cider is fermented apple
> juice. Perry is
> fermented pear juice. Would a non-sweetened, all-juice
> ferment be a "wine"
> or more "cider"-related?
>
> Warm Regards,
> Shawn
>
> --------------------------------------------------------------
> -----------
> To unsubscribe from this list, send email to
> majordomo at pbm.com containing
> the words "unsubscribe hist-brewing" (or unsubscribe
> hist-brewing-digest, if
> you get the digest.) To contact a human about problems, send mail to
> owner-hist-brewing at pbm.com
>
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe from this list, send email to majordomo at pbm.com containing
the words "unsubscribe hist-brewing" (or unsubscribe hist-brewing-digest, if
you get the digest.) To contact a human about problems, send mail to
owner-hist-brewing at pbm.com
More information about the hist-brewing
mailing list