hist-brewing: Re: hist-brewing-digest V1 #170

pwp at cs.cmu.edu pwp at cs.cmu.edu
Mon Sep 28 12:03:46 PDT 1998

Al writes:

< Finally, I'm willing to bet that all beers made more than 200 years
< ago had a significant amount of bacterial and Brettanomyces sourness.

Well, I doubt I got any Brett. by accident, having used a bunch of
Iodophor, and not having made any pseudo-lambic in my house or with
this equipment.  But on day 4 (yesterday) it had noticeably soured --
I suspect Lactobacillus from the taste -- it was at about a "Rodenbach
Red" level of sourness.  It was also *just* starting to clear

But yes, I think you are almost certainly right that any really old
beer or ale would be an awfully lot like a (true) Lambic.

On the other, other hand, 4 *days* would be "old" for this stuff, so
I'm not that worried about the one- or two-year-long aging that
genuine Lambic gets.

< I'm sorry if this sounds like I'm picking on you, Paul... I don't mean
< to... I guess I'm still just a little miffed at the alleged "ancient
< beer" made by Scottish and Newcastle in which they researched the grains
< and spices and then simply pitched some standard S&N production yeast.

Not at all.  These are the sorts of comments I'm looking for to help
sharpen this all up.


To unsubscribe from this list, send email to majordomo at pbm.com containing
the words "unsubscribe hist-brewing" (or unsubscribe hist-brewing-digest, if
you get the digest.) To contact a human about problems, send mail to
owner-hist-brewing at pbm.com

More information about the hist-brewing mailing list